Trump administration orders dismantling of the U.S. Forest Service

The headquarters is going to Utah. Every regional office is being shuttered. The research program is being destroyed.
usfs staff outside DC headquarters
Forest Service staff gather outside the agency's headquarters in the Sidney R. Yates Federal Building in Washington, D.C. in January 2026. As part of the administration's sweeping changes, the Forest Service's headquarters will leave DC and relocate to Salt Lake City, UT (photo: Preston Keres / USDA).

Late Tuesday afternoon, with the subtlety of a wrecking ball and the morality of a foreclosure notice, the Trump administration announced the most devastating attack on the U.S. Forest Service in the agency’s 121-year history. Not a budget cut. Not a policy shift. Not a “reorganization.” An execution.

They’re ripping the headquarters out of Washington and shipping it to Salt Lake City, Utah — the beating heart of the anti-public-lands movement in America. They’re shuttering every single one of the ten regional offices that have governed this agency since Gifford Pinchot built the system over a century ago — and with them, the career professionals who spent entire lifetimes earning the expertise and the authority to push back when politicians came calling with bad ideas and worse motives. They’re destroying more than fifty research facilities across thirty-one states, labs that house decades of irreplaceable long-term science, the kind you literally cannot restart once it’s gone. And they’re replacing all of it — the offices, the scientists, the institutional knowledge, the professional independence — with fifteen political appointees called “state directors,” embedded in state capitals alongside the very governors, legislators, and industry lobbyists who have spent their careers demanding that the Forest Service log more, protect less, and get out of the way.

One hundred and ninety-three million acres of your national forests. An area larger than Texas. The largest public land agency in the country. Just handed, on a silver platter, to the people who’ve spent their entire careers trying to destroy it.

And they did it with a press release on a Tuesday.

This Is Not a Reorganization

Let me be very clear about what’s happening here, because the press release is designed to make your eyes glaze over. It’s written in the dead language of bureaucratic euphemism — “mission delivery,” “state-based organizational model,” “operational service centers” — and that’s the point. They want you bored. They want you to think this is an org chart shuffle. They want you to read the word “streamlining” and move on with your day.

Don’t.

What this actually is, stripped of the Orwellian window dressing, is the largest forced purge of a federal land management agency in American history. It dwarfs anything that’s come before. The BLM headquarters move in Trump’s first term — widely understood, even then, as a deliberate gutting of the agency — involved a few hundred positions. This involves thousands. That one closed zero regional offices. This one closes all ten. That one touched one agency’s headquarters. This one dismantles the headquarters, collapses the regional structure, and wipes out the scientific backbone of the largest forestry organization on Earth.

The BLM move was a knife in the dark. This is a chainsaw in broad daylight. And just like the BLM move, it will work exactly as designed. Because we know what happens when you tell career public servants to uproot their families and move across the country on six months’ notice. We have the data. We watched it happen in real time.

Of 328 BLM positions ordered to relocate, 287 employees left the agency. Only 41 moved at all — scattered across various western offices. And only three — three human beings — actually relocated to the new “headquarters” in Grand Junction. The agency lost 87% of its Washington-based workforce. Decades of institutional knowledge, scientific expertise, and legal acumen walked out the door and never came back.

That wasn’t an accident. That was the plan. And the plan worked so well they’re doing it again at twenty times the scale.

Because the people who leave won’t be random. They’ll be the lifers. The scientists. The ones with thirty years of field experience who know what a logging plan will do to a watershed before anyone runs a model. The ones who know the law cold, who know where the bodies are buried, who have the institutional authority and the backbone to say “no” when a politician calls and demands more timber sales. Those are the people who can’t uproot their lives. Those are the people who will retire, or resign, or take jobs in the private sector.

And those are exactly the people this administration wants gone.

Because once they’re gone, you replace them. With loyalists. With industry allies. With people who have never set foot in a national forest but know exactly whose phone calls to return. You don’t need to fire anyone. You just announce a “move” and let attrition do the killing for you.

Then you fill the vacancies with your own people and pretend the agency still exists.

They Handed It to Utah

Of all the places on this Earth to send the agency that manages America’s national forests, they chose Salt Lake City, Utah.

Coincidence?

No.

Utah. The state that is, right now, at this very moment, suing the federal government to seize 18.5 million acres of your public land. A case engineered from the start to reach a sympathetic Supreme Court and detonate 150 years of settled public land law.

Utah Governor Spencer Cox (left) and logging executive and USFS Chief Tom Schultz (right) sign a partnership agreement
Utah Governor Spencer Cox (left) and logging executive and USFS Chief Tom Schultz (right) sign a partnership agreement (photo:

Utah. The state whose governor, Spencer Cox, just weeks ago signed a deal with this same Forest Service Chief — the former logging executive — giving Utah de facto control over Forest Service operations on eight million acres of national forest. A “partnership” we called out at the time for exactly what it was: a dry run for transfer. Control without ownership. The first step in a playbook designed to embed the state in federal decision-making so deeply that the line between federal and state management disappears, and when the inevitable push for full transfer comes, the argument writes itself: “We’re already managing it. Why shouldn’t we own it?”

Utah. The state that produced Mike Lee — the rat in the walls of Congress, the most dangerous anti-public-lands politician in modern American history — a man who has spent his entire miserable career trying to sell your national parks, gut the Wilderness Act, auction off BLM land to developers, and dismantle every protection standing between your forests and the industries that want to devour them. And if you think Mike Lee didn’t have his fingerprints all over this decision, I have a bridge over the Colorado River to sell you.

Utah. The state that has been ground zero for the anti-public-lands movement for as long as the movement has existed. A hotbed of Sagebrush Rebellion ideology, where the political class has spent decades trying every conceivable legal, legislative, and administrative maneuver to wrest federal land out of public hands and into the grip of state politicians and their industry patrons.

And now the United States government is handing them the headquarters of the agency that manages 193 million acres of national forest.

In the USDA’s press release, Utah Governor Spencer Cox calls this “a big win for Utah.”

Yes. Obviously.

And of course he’s in the release — when you’re effectively calling the shots, you tend to get top billing at the Forest Service.

It’s the biggest win Utah’s anti-public-lands machine has ever secured — bigger than Bears Ears, bigger than the Forest Service “partnership,” bigger than anything Mike Lee has managed to slither through Congress.

Because this one didn’t need Congress. This one didn’t need the courts. This one just needed a press release and a compliant logging executive with a title that says “Chief” on it.

The Desecration of Roosevelt and Pinchot

I need to stop here because this part will make your blood boil.

Forest Service Chief Tom Schultz — a logging executive, installed by this administration to oversee the dismemberment of the agency he now claims to lead — had the gall, the sheer sickening audacity, to say this in the press release:

“I’m honored to help guide this new chapter for the Forest Service, following the vision set forth by President Theodore Roosevelt and Gifford Pinchot more than a century ago.”

Let that sink in.

Theodore Roosevelt created the national forests to protect them from exactly the kind of industrial plunder this administration is enabling. Gifford Pinchot built the Forest Service from scratch, brick by brick, to ensure that America’s forests would be managed by trained professionals in the public interest — not by political appointees serving the timber industry from a satellite office in the state that wants to own those forests.

Roosevelt fought the robber barons. Pinchot fought the timber trusts. They built this agency as a shield for the American public against the exact forces that are now being handed the keys.

And Tom Schultz — a man who made his career cutting trees for profit before being plucked from the industry to run the agency that’s supposed to regulate it — invokes their names while dismantling their life’s work.

It’s vile.

Roosevelt would have run this man out of Washington on a rail. Pinchot would have fought this tooth and nail with every ounce of breath in him. And both of them would be sickened — not just by the decision, but by the grinning cowardice of a political appointee who uses their legacy as a fig leaf while gutting everything they fought to build.

usfs researchers
USFS International Institute of Tropical Forestry researchers in discussion prior to collection of samples from the Bisley Research Area (photo: Preston Keres / USDA).

Destroying the Science So No One Can Say No

If the headquarters move is the gunshot, the destruction of the research program is the burial.

More than fifty research and development facilities across thirty-one states. Gone. Consolidated into a single location in Fort Collins, Colorado. And “consolidated” is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence, because what it actually means is that decades of place-based, long-term ecological research — the kind that literally cannot exist anywhere else because it depends on specific forests, specific watersheds, specific ecosystems studied over generations — will be snuffed out.

You cannot move a thirty-year watershed study. You cannot relocate a decades-long old-growth monitoring program. You cannot box up a forest and ship it to Colorado. When these facilities close, the experiments die. The datasets end. The partnerships with universities that took generations to build collapse. And the institutional knowledge of the scientists who ran those programs walks out the door, because the administration damn well knows most of them won’t follow a forced relocation to a single consolidated office that has nothing to do with the ecosystems they’ve spent their careers studying.

This is the most respected forestry research program on the planet. It’s the reason we understand wildfire behavior, forest disease, watershed health, carbon storage, old-growth ecology, and climate adaptation. It’s the scientific backbone that every responsible land management decision depends on. It’s the envy of land managers across the world.

And they’re destroying it. Not because it’s expensive — the entire research budget is a rounding error. Not because it’s inefficient — decentralized, place-based research is the only kind of forest science that works. They’re destroying it because science is an obstacle.

Because a scientist who says “you can’t log that watershed without destroying it” is inconvenient. A researcher who publishes data showing that a timber sale will wipe out a salmon run is a problem. A lab that documents the damage from mining runoff or road-building or clear-cutting is an enemy.

And enemies get eliminated.

Once the science is gone, there’s nobody left to flag the damage. Nobody left to say “this will destroy this stream” or “this species can’t survive this level of harvest.” The unprecedented mandatory logging quotas from the reconciliation bill can proceed without anyone left who has the data, the authority, or the institutional standing to object. The timber industry gets its clearcuts. The mining companies get their access roads. And the next time someone asks “what will this do to the forest?” the answer will be silence, because the people who knew are gone and the studies that would have told us were terminated by press release on a Tuesday in March.

The Playbook in Real Time

We’ve been writing about this for over a year. We’ve been called alarmist. We’ve been told “that’s not going to happen.”

Here’s the playbook, one more time, because it’s no longer a prediction. It’s a live feed:

  1. Starve the land agencies of funding, staff, expertise, and authority. Done. This administration gutted more than 25% of land management agency staff. It proposed a budget that slashed the Forest Service by a third. It tried to eliminate all Forest Service research funding.
  2. Break the agency’s ability to function. Done. Mass firings. Deferred resignations. DOGE operatives embedded inside the agency. Psychological warfare campaigns designed to demoralize career employees into quitting.
  3. Point to the dysfunction you engineered and declare the institution a failure. Done. The press release itself does this, citing “decades of mismanagement and costly deferred maintenance” — problems created by the very people now using them as justification for demolition.
  4. Reorganize the broken agency into something that serves your interests, not the public’s. Happening right now. Today. On your screen. With a press release that uses the words “common sense” five times.
  5. Hand the pieces to your allies in state government and industry. Also happening right now. The headquarters goes to Utah. State directors answer to state politicians. The research that would have documented the damage: gone. The career professionals who would have resisted: purged through “relocation.”
  6. And there is Step 6, the one they haven’t announced yet but that every single move in this sequence is building toward: Transfer the land.

Because once you’ve moved the headquarters to the state that wants to own the forests, installed state-aligned political appointees as managers, destroyed the independent science, eliminated the institutional capacity to resist, and created a structure where state governments are functionally running federal forests already — the argument for formal transfer becomes very, very easy.

“We’re already managing it. Why should Washington own it?”

That’s the endgame. And after today, the path to it has never been shorter.

The Bigger Picture

Zoom out. Look at the mosaic. All of it. Everything that’s happened in the last fourteen months:

A logging executive installed as Forest Service Chief. An oil governor running Interior. Steve Pearce, a man who believes Theodore Roosevelt was wrong to create national parks and forests, nominated to run the BLM. NEPA dismantled. The Endangered Species Act under siege. The Roadless Rule rescinded. Alaska’s wildlands opened to industry. Mandatory logging quotas signed into law. The God Squad convened for the first time in thirty years to override endangered species protections for oil drilling. Utah’s governor cutting a deal for control of your national forests. Utah suing for 18.5 million acres of your BLM land. Russ Fulcher circulating letters in Idaho preparing counties for federal land transfer. Mike Lee hiding poison pills in must-pass bills trying to sell your lands.

And now this. The crown jewel. The big one.

The agency that manages 193 million acres of your forests — relocated to the state that wants to own them, stripped of its science, stripped of its regional expertise, stripped of its institutional independence, and reorganized into a structure purpose-built for political compliance.

Anyone who still thinks these are unrelated events, disconnected policy decisions made by different people at different times for different reasons, is in willful denial. This is a coordinated demolition of federal land stewardship in America. Every piece connects. Every move advances the same goal: transferring control of your public lands from professional public servants accountable to you to political operatives accountable to the extraction industry.

The Forest Service was the last major federal land agency that still had the institutional muscle to resist. It had the scientists. It had the regional foresters. It had the culture, imperfect as it was, that still believed forests belonged to the public.

After today, that agency no longer exists.

There will still be people wearing the shield. There will still be an org chart and a budget line. But the Forest Service that Gifford Pinchot built — the institution that pioneered the radical idea that America’s forests are not timber inventory to be liquidated but a public trust to be stewarded — was killed today.

And they did it without a single vote in Congress.

What You Must Do Right Now

Call your senators. Call your representative. Not next week or later. Now.

Tell them this is not a reorganization — it’s the destruction of a federal agency by executive fiat and that Congress must intervene. Tell them to block all funding for this relocation and restructuring until the full implications have been studied, debated, and voted on by the people’s elected representatives.

Tell them you know what happened to the BLM. Tell them 87% staff loss is not efficiency. Tell them that three people showing up to Grand Junction is not “moving closer to the land.” Tell them that if they allow this to proceed, the Forest Service will suffer the same fate at twenty times the scale, and the blood will be on their hands.

Tell them you know the endgame. Tell them this is the on-ramp to land transfer. Tell them that handing the headquarters to Utah while Utah is actively suing to seize your public land is not a coincidence — it’s a tell.

And tell every conservation organization, every outdoor recreation company, every hunting and fishing group, every single person who has ever set foot on a national forest and felt something — tell them the time for polite statements and “concern” is over. The building is on fire. The arsonists are inside. And if we don’t act now, there will be very little left to save.

Stay loud. Stay angry. Stay relentless.

They want us tired and resigned. Don’t give them that satisfaction.

These forests belong to you. Fight for them like your life depends on it.

Because it does.

Comments

Too bad!
You people just won't stop them.
When in the world will it be too much?
It's been too much for at least his current term (actually much more).
I'm Canadian, I can't do it for you.
Use your ever so revered Constitution and court system and actually deal with it!
Just flippen deal with it! You're ruining the entire world, not to mention the earth.

To everyone from other countries who thinks castigating the millions of US citizens who didn't vote for him, don't want him, and are living in fear is some how useful: please just stop. Please. Don't you think that if we could boot him straight to jail, we would?

Particularly entertained by the Canadian yammering about using the Constitution. Because, of course, that’s exactly what Trump is doing. There is zero authorization for the ownership of land by the FedGov other than as necessary to support the enumerated powers. None. Zilch. The stated - written - expectation of the Founders was that the FedGov would return “federal” lands to the states.

Thank you for speaking the truth. All our "leaders" continue to gaslight us about this so-called "re-org." (Written on my lunch break on my personal phone...).

Not supported by the Constitution and likely just a jobs program that costs taxpayers in the end. Let CA put out it's own fires from now on. Good riddance

The Forest Circus has been the haven of hack hippies, and Marxist pseudo-conservationalists, for at too long. Their “Let -it-burn policy has destroyed far more forest and timber and lives of wild animals that anything done otherwise. Allowing trails and roads to close due to tree-fall, and penalizing hunters, Anglers, and firewood cutters who try to keep the roads open, is criminal. When sales are planned for logging, data is purposely leaked to big city lawyers who monkey-wrench the entire system. The goal is let trees mature to the rotting stage, so they do NO ONE any good. They are anti-use, anti-harvest, and anti-American. Leftist hacks in the FS administration, need to be fired, long ago.

I totally agree with you, its about time we saw and end the overreach of the Federal government and EPA dictating what the citizens of America can do with their own property and the forest areas around them.

You are a retard. These agencies protect you and every other American. The only “people” who benefit are corporations and their shareholders who do not live on or near the land they are destroying.

So you would rather see your public lands sold off to the highest bidder and clear-cut? Defunding of the USFS over the past several decades has led to deferred maintenance backlogs, I still do not understand how you are justifying the selling off of our lands. Take another shot of bleach and some ivermectin, the world needs one less of you.

If you believe all of that, wait until you see what throw country will look like once they are done polluting every stream, clear-cutting every mountain and poisoning everything in sight. And so much ignorance about fires in California. So many of them are on private land where people don't do anything to clear the land in lieu of fire. There as nothing more pathetic than you people arguing about the forest management for the Detweiller Fire, a fire in chapparel and on private land, not a forest!

Now, imagine what access will be like when all that land becomes private. No more fishing, hunting, gathering wood, because now a private enterprise owns it and you would be criminally trespassing.

Hank - Did you know that forests play an immense role in carbon sequestration and storage, and the old growth trees store the most carbon? Logging efforts and road building creates soil erosion which damages watersheds relied on by anglers. Road building creates barriers to migration for animals which harms hunters. The protection of forests is not just a hippie power grab, it is to benefit all of the multiple uses that our forests provide for us in a way that will sustain the forests for future generations. There are real reasons behind these forest protection initiatives, and real harms that come from endless logging. There are some great educational articles about forest ecology, effects of logging, and fire ecology that might change your perspective.

Old growth DOES NOT fix the most carbon...it's GROWTH that fixes carbon and that means young rapidly regenerating forest does that job best. Of course, if you buy into the hoax that CO2 is somehow bad, then you care about that.

1 question. Do you live ina house built with wood?

You have to see the larger picture here. The thieves f running the white house figured out the best way to steal from the public to line their own pockets is to be at war. Other departments have audits, inspector generals (even though most were fired), accountability. But the Pentagon never passes an audit, if we are at war you can steal MASS amounts of money through military contracts. And DHS was founded, after 9/11, as a way to funnel massive amounts of monies to cronies with very little oversight in the name of national security. It became a legitimate agency over time but it didn't start out that way and it isn't that now.

In that context, it's easy to see what this is. It's theft of a public resource and delivering it to private hands. It's clear as day. And at a time when climate change is accelerating and preserving those forrests is more important than ever, to preserve a planet we can actually live on. So yeah, call your reps. Talk to your MAGA relatives who like public parks and the outdoors. This is theft, it fits a pattern of theft, the framing of this article is exactly right.

TDS

Thanks so much for this article. I have close friends that have dedicated their lives to the National Forest Service. What can we do besides contact congress as they seem ineffective on stopping any terrible thing this administration is doing. The land belongs to the people not to billionaires and politicians to destroy for their profit. I have read many studies that my friend has done. This could be the undoing of civilization.

The tree-hugging, city folk-manipulating hustlers at places like Ctr. for Biodiversity, So. Env. Law Ctr, etc, who have used the ridiculous NEPA public participation element to stall, stall, and upon "substantially prevailing" when filing on a friendly administration (read, Clinton's especially) are finally getting their comeuppence. They have milked the Eq. Acc. to Justice Act for billions of the public's tax dollars while removing scientific management for the FS quiver. Nobody has done more damage to U.S. Forests than a USFS stymied by corrupt, NGOs as noted. This is the only way to clean up the sewer. Wipe it out and start over.

While I am no fan of this administration by any means, I am shocked that Hatch magazine has chosen to peddle fake news! The prior comments, of course, then become uninformed as well.
I have no doubt that there are nefarious intentions here, as I trust these scoundrels in office same as you (which is on ALL of us for them being in office, because in this country, we don’t vote, we just bitch and moan). But, back to my point- the reporting, especially the headline and the first paragraph are just patently untrue and NOT what has happened to date. Fine if you report your interpretation as such; but to trade in this pettiness just makes your rag another one I choose not to believe. Hatch Magazine is now just Disney World - for entertainment only. What a disappointment. And to you Canadian know it alls- mind your own beeswax! Read and comment in Canadian journals! You are not helpful. We know what we have and we hate it. And thanks for the little bit of help on D-Day!

I could not agree with you more. This article, ne tirade, is an utter disappointment, and Hatch magazine is now a "rag".

All of you that are for this are some serious scumbags. Every last fucking one of you. I hope there is only pain in your future. Ugly, horrific pain.

Boy o boy. TDS is alive and well in this artilcle and in the comments. Getting the Forest service out of DC is probably the best thing that could happen. Get the liberals out of it.
If Biden or King Obama had done this it would have been brilliant, right. Before you condemn it, see what happens. Them go to the polls and prove who you are and vote. Until then do as I was told as a child. "Keep you eyes and your ears open and your mouth shut until you have something intelligent to say.

All you guys have is hypotheticals. "If Obama did this..." well he didn't. Cuz it's a stupid thing to do! You can't be serious that you think giving control to Mike Lee and Utah is going to be what's best for our forests. Just say you don't care about public lands instead of trying to convince yourself you're so smart with bullshit whataboutisms. Coward.

How detestable. Telling people to shut up and wait. People can speak up at any time. As is our right.

This is horrible. However, there isn't much anyone can do. Protests clearly aren't going to change anything. It's sad, but with billionaires at the top, our public land is theirs for the taking.. There isn't anything the people of the U.S can do.

All I can say is, I'm very happy I chose not to bring kids into this world. They probably won't get to enjoy public land, if they can even spare a few minutes of time working 80 hours a week to afford a 1 bedroom apartment.

Thank you for this article. I didn’t understand the full meaning of this move from the Trump administration when I initially read about it on news sites. You did an excellent and important job by letting us know what this means for our public lands. I am very surprised I have not heard more outcry.

Anglers and the readers of this publication are largely Trumpers. Any environmental concerns they may have are minor compared to their desire to have immigrants persecuted, etc.

They paved paradise and put up a parking lot…

You know, I might have read this if I had known what country you were talking about. America is a group of continents in the Western Hemisphere, consisting of 35 sovereign nations and 25 terroritories.

You said Salt Lake City, so I have to assume you were talking about the United States. The country Salt Lake City is in. Typical, another foreigner complaining about a country they aren't even from.

These comments are…wow. Polarized would be kind. It’s like Fox News had a bot go scorched earth and hit all the buzzwords to downplay this article and try to get people to goose step along. All I know is these are MY lands. Not Utah’s. Not the state’s. OURS. The key words were in a previous comment: monkey wrench.

This is a good thing. I’d much rather someone start mining deep in the forests somewhere and put the land to good use. Who cares about some stream that might be destroyed, or some health hazard. Mine baby mine! Chop it all down! As long as someone can make a few dollars it should all be for sale as far as I’m concerned. Only pinko commies would want to keep a few forests around— a desert full of strip malls sounds much better to me.

Look at all the paid anti-science, anti-environment Trump boot-licking dopes commenting. They need a good ass-kicking.

There is no limit to the hatred I feel toward trump and his minions, every weak puke of them. Every swinging republican and then all the trash that hangs with him…Miller, Graham, Johnson, etc.

You keep talking about the science. This is science from the same type of people who gave us the Covid science. It is well past the time that you tree hugging whores stop pushing your agenda on the people about what you consider to be science and let all Americans use these public lands. You never did own OUR public land and now you no longer get to decide what we get to do on OUR land! This move is way over due. It’s a great day for all Americans!

Science destroyed Santa Fe Natl Forest's wildlife habitat, native trout, homes, domestic water, businesses, human lives when the Forest Service lit a prescribed burn on a windy April day. The Hermit Peak fire. Terrible.

So Hatch is now becoming a poloitical rag rather than a fishing mag.

To all you liberal anti-Trumpers.. We survived Obama who refused to acknowledge his white mother. Who gave the Iranians billions to buld nukes. Who didnt do one thing to help minorities in America.
We survive Biden. Who didnt know where he was most of the time. Who gave us 14% inflation and gas prices atleast a buck higher than current price. Who funnelled millions into his famly via the Ukraine. Who looked at his watch while bringing home the bodies of the soldiers killed in his botched afghan retreat. Who allowed millions of illegals i to America bringing crime and destruction and taxin us to give them free stuff and getting them to vote democrat.
You will survive Trump who gave us a strong economy where anyone wanting a job could get one. Where Iran was prevented from getting a nuke. Wher the world saw conflicts ended. Where all the democrat lies were prove to be just lies and the pathetic No Kings gatherings did nothing but show the lunacy of liberas as we dont allow kings in America.
In 3 years we will move on to some othe president whom half the country will hate. After that one another and another. Unlike the communist world where their leaders rule till they die or are overthrown.
Get. Over yourselves for with all its faults America is the greatest country in the world.

Pages