Well written - and informative of your groups position. However you need to spend less money on lawyers than write well and more on ones that have a solid foundation of logic. If you argument was we should eradicate the rainbows and leave the creek “fishless” it would be a waste of an great opportunity to preserve nature in the face of range loss but it would at least make sense

But saying we should do nothing because it will impact the natural environment ignores that man already has done that and it will get worse by leaving the rainbows as they overtake the native cutthroat

So while I appreciate the effort to protect nature - your stance is wrong in this situation and there are dozens of other places to focus your efforts and dollars