An observation on the rod market

It's been said that history repeats itself
fly rod and reel
Photo: Charlie Morgan

“There has been a decided tendency in recent years toward rods which are stiffer and faster in action than those of the past.

To a great extent this is a good thing, as the rods of twenty or thirty years ago were apt to be too slow and soft. But as frequently is the case, a movement away from one tendency has swung too far in the opposite direction. With the advent of the stiffer rod, lines necessarily have had to be increased in weight.”

This quote pretty much sums up the status of the graphite fly rod market in 2020. The majority of the rods made today are generally too stiff for their intended use, resulting in a number of detrimental consequences. Perhaps the most significant are a lack of feel when casting ordinary fishing distances, and the excess physical effort it takes to make these rods perform at those distances because of their refusal to load.

In an attempt to offset this development, fly line manufacturers have actually been increasing the weight of their lines—in essence taking 5-weight lines and renaming them as 4-weights, taking 6-weights and calling them 5-weights, and so on. (Heaven forbid that we call out the rod companies on this matter; after all, they’re the ones trying to con us into believing a 6 or 7-weight rod is actually a 5-weight. But of this, more another day.)

The great irony here is that these developments represent nothing new. The statement I’ve quoted above wasn’t penned yesterday, last month, or even last year. It’s from 1951, was written by John Atherton, and appears in his book The Fish and the Fly. Yes, seventy years on, we find ourselves once again pounding well-trodden ground.

It’s been said that history repeats itself. With respect to flyfishing, in my estimation, there’s little doubt that it does—and that’s not always a good thing.


Not sure I agree with this article, I have bought the new Sage Trout LL and Loomis Asquith rods in past year and load nicely in close with a standard weighted line. Also the Douglas G seems to be quite popular which is a fairly soft rod.

Yep. Would you buy a new $1000 rod if you sucked at casting it the same as you do with your $99 rod? Overlining rods is a quick way to become a better caster.

The over stiff rods that require overweight lines makes buying line for regular rods difficult.
For any rod 5 weight and down that a person is going to use in regular trout fishing throwing both dries and nymphs, I recommend buying Cabellas/Bass Pro or TFO as they are designed to actually fish. The big dollar manufacturers sell rods for real trout fishing but they are all about extremes of either way too stiff or too soft . Unless you carry a golf bag of rods when you wade , having a rod that only fishes dries but is too soft to fish nymphs (or vice versa) is silly. I have seen videos of people actually carrying multiple rods while wading. Are guides to be rod caddies now?

That is 1 reason why I love my old Sage SLT 5wt. It is softer and loads beautifully. On the other hand, my Sage RPL 6 is a lot stiffer. Good for streamers and weighted nymph rugs, but not so much for small drys.

Tom Bell of Sunray Flyfishing (UK) has taken a different approach - Super lightweight small diameter fly lines matched with lightweight responsive rods. If presentation is important to you while maximizing distance when needed then this combo is for you. We